Date of Award

8-2016

Culminating Project Type

Thesis

Degree Name

English: Rhetoric and Writing: M.A.

Department

English

College

College of Liberal Arts

First Advisor

James Heiman

Second Advisor

Rex Veeder

Third Advisor

Kristian Twombly

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.

Keywords and Subject Headings

Composition, ideology, cut-up, expressivism, social-epistemic

Abstract

In 2015, Roeder and Gatto edited and published Critical Expressivism: Theory and Practice in the Composition Classroom, which attempts to present a new understanding of expressivism as a viable means of teaching composition in a twenty-first century world. By emphasizing the self as central to the social construction of reality, Critical Expressivism critiques social-epistemic pedagogy and, more specifically, James Berlin. But the self and the social are so intertwined that they are actually one and the same; we are always-already social beings. The distinction between critical expressivist and social-epistemic rhetorics, then, is more semantic than substantial. To build a connection between these two pedagogies, I explore William Burroughs’s and Brion Gysin’s cut-up method and an associated theory of language and ideology: the “word-virus.” The word-virus demonstrates that composition is neither entirely personal nor entirely social. In essence, the social/individual divide is revealed to be a false dichotomy—one that has potential implications for anyone who teaches composition, particularly those who are still learning to become writing teachers.

Available for download on Tuesday, August 01, 2017

Share

COinS