"Perceptions of Effectiveness: Role and Function of the Director of Spe" by Charles S. Strand

The Repository @ St. Cloud State

Open Access Knowledge and Scholarship

Date of Award

5-1986

Culminating Project Type

Thesis

Department

Special Education

College

School of Education

First Advisor

Richard A. Johnson

Second Advisor

Jerry Welik

Third Advisor

Gerald Wedlund

Keywords and Subject Headings

ROLE AND FUNCTION OF SPECIAL EDUCATION DIRECTOR

Abstract

PROBLEM:

Among a number of skill areas historically associated with the role of a Director of Special Education, which skill areas are more highly related to perceived effectiveness, as viewed by Directors of Special Education and by School Superintendents?

PROCEDURE:

Fifty (50) Directors of Special Education and seventy-seven (77) Superintendents of Schools were surveyed by mail as to potential effectiveness of the role of the Director of Special Education. Background information was sought dealing with the type of special education service agency, geographic location, and population of students. Six (6) main skill areas were surveyed detailed by thirty-five (35) specific line items related to the main areas. A five point importance scale from "crucial" to "not important" was used to determine potential effectiveness areas.

FINDINGS:

Studies have been conducted through the years generating lists of competencies which a Director of Special Education should possess. A commonality was seen within these listings. This field study project attempted to identify those skill areas which would help one in the role of Director of Special Education to be effective. After a careful analysis of the 86% return of surveys, the results revealed that several areas of competence were ranked very highly based on the importance scale used. There were, however, four (4) main areas which, overwhelmingly, received "Crucial" ratings as viewed by both groups in the sampling.

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS:

To be effective in the role of Director of Special Education a number of functions are important. Based on the results of this field study, four (4) predominant areas emerged as being "Crucial" in terms of effectiveness in the role of Director of Special Education. Budget, communication, decision making, and special education law emerged as being crucial. Numerous other functions were also viewed as highly important aspects. A set of six (6) conclusions is included in Chapter IV of this document.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.