The Repository @ St. Cloud State

Open Access Knowledge and Scholarship

Date of Award

5-2026

Culminating Project Type

Dissertation

Styleguide

apa

Degree Name

Higher Education Administration: Ed.D.

Department

Educational Administration and Higher Education

College

School of Education

First Advisor

Emeka Ikegwuonu

Second Advisor

Joy McKenzie

Third Advisor

Rebecca Nelson Crowell

Fourth Advisor

Jennifer Jones, Steven McCullar

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.

Keywords and Subject Headings

clinical education, clinical educator development, onboarding, supervision, Speech-language Pathology, ICED model, training needs, workload, higher education, CAA, CFCC, ASHA.

Abstract

This study examines how clinical directors in U.S. Speech-language Pathology (SLP) graduate programs prepare and support clinical educators, their perceptions of training needs, and how director workload relates to onboarding practices. Using a cross-sectional survey guided by the Integrated Clinical Educator Development (ICED) model proposed by the investigator, responses from 100 accredited programs revealed that onboarding is common but highly variable, typically led by clinical directors, and often informal. Content included in onboarding most frequently includes program operations, documentation, grading, CFCC supervision requirements, and feedback skills, with fewer programs addressing cultural or generational considerations. Clinical directors overwhelmingly viewed the current national requirement- a one-time 2-hour supervision CE- as insufficient and expressed strong support for ongoing, standardized, and program-specific training with support from regulatory bodies and their institutions. Workload constraints significantly affect clinical directors’ ability to deliver consistent onboarding. Findings highlight the need for structured, longitudinal preparation, protected time, and stronger institutional support to ensure consistent, high-quality clinical educator development. Limitations include reliance on solely clinical director perspectives and a cross-sectional quantitative survey design.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.