Date of Award
5-1980
Culminating Project Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Special Education: M.S.
Department
Special Education
College
School of Education
First Advisor
William Lovelace
Second Advisor
Joan Bigler
Third Advisor
Margaret Rauch
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Keywords and Subject Headings
Reading, Comprehension, Elementary, Education, Research
Abstract
PROBLEM:
An effective 'teaching procedure was needed to improve the comprehension skills of an eight year old male.
PROCEDURE:
This study examined the effectiveness of three teaching methods. These methods were questioning (Procedure A), sequence of ideas (Procedure B) and outlining the main idea. and details (Procedure C). The three methods were alternated with instructional sessions on an unpredictable schedule. A 100 word story was used in each session followed by ten questions. Questions consisted of five textually explicit questions, three textually implicit and two scriptal implicit questions. A multi-element design was used. Results were graphed.
FINDINGS:
Training for Procedure C took longer to master. Procedure A resulted in 61 percent accuracy on questions. Procedure B resulted in 71 percent and Procedure C resulted in 87 percent accuracy. Accuracy according to types of questions ranged from 71 percent to 75 percent. Procedure C showed the most accuracy on the three types of questions~
CONCLUSIONS:
Using an out1ine procedure of main idea and details was the best method of comprehension instruction for this child. This supports earlier theories that the ability to organize material aids comprehension. The method utilizing sequence was not as effective as the method of outlining but it was more effective than the method of questioning.
Recommended Citation
Hakes, Barbara K., "An Analysis of the Effectiveness of Three Teaching Procedures on Improving Comprehension" (1980). Culminating Projects in Special Education. 183.
https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/sped_etds/183
Included in
Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research Commons, Special Education and Teaching Commons